Finweek, in conjunction with MBAConnect.net, has just released their first research report on the impact the MBA has on the lives of students and graduates in South Africa. This survey probed the question on whether or not the MBA was a worthy endeavor and what impact this objective had on the lives of students and graduates. Over 1500 respondents shared their views on the good and bad of the MBA pursuit. Here’s a few of the key findings of the survey.
One of the more interesting findings was related to why students pursue the MBA. Popular opinion suggests that the MBA is sought for career advancement and better pay. This survey found that professionals obtained the MBA to “be more productive in a business environment.” However, 77% of respondents indicated they had received a promotion or greater responsibility after earning the MBA.
Is the MBA a positive force on their career? Over 95% of respondents felt that the MBA improved their decision-making abilities. Nearly 90% felt the MBA bestowed more credibility on their careers by elevating the perceptions others had of them and improving their ability to interact with others at various levels. The MBA also made them better leaders, with other 90% of respondents attributing their skills learned in courses, skills learned from group interaction and a heightened self-awareness as the main drivers for this improvement.
Career changers found some benefit from the MBA, as 56% of the respondents changed careers after graduation. Of these graduates, 65% said the MBA made the difference.
One of the more profound positive impacts identified was the change in their outlook on life. Over two-thirds felt the MBA opened their eyes to new opportunities, renewed their interest in the business world and improved their level of confidence and self-belief.
As you might expect, the MBA isn’t “all that.” There were a few downsides to its pursuit. Most students (68%) stated that the financial requirements forced them to cut back on normal lifestyle expenses. Negative impacts were noted with regards to diet (48%), sleep (82%), stress (81%) and sex (42%).
What about beyond the MBA? This survey found room for improvement within the universities for several key career-related activities for Alumni. These include access to MBA-level job opportunities and networking events, helping graduates start and grow businesses and building personal brands.
While these are only a few of the results, it’s important to note the overall message from the survey; that is, the MBA is worth the pursuit. Even though students and graduates felt the universities were failing to meet some expectations, they are still looking to the MBA programs to be a big part of their post-MBA career.
You can find the survey results at MBAConnect.net (http://www.mbaconnect.net/finweeksurvey.aspx).

What does this book offer?
How do you become successful with an MBA?
Many professionals today are searching for that one key to a highly successful career...the MBA. After they’ve earned it, they struggle with achieving the success they expected. The problem is that they don’t learn to communicate their new value to managers, potential employers and many others. This book will provide considerable insight to what many MBAs have done. Also, you’ll learn how they’ve found the value and shared it with others to achieve the success they sought. Lastly, you’ll get a simple plan to follow to establish your own value proposition.This is a question asked by too many MBA graduates. MBA programs teach critical business skills but few teach you how to communicate the value of the combination of your new skills, knowledge and experience. Opportunities for great success don’t come often. Graduates must be able to respond to such opportunities immediately with no hesitation.
The value of this book
No one argues that networking is a vital part of your career. Brand new college graduates already know that their network is the biggest factor in finding their first job after graduation. If you’ve been laid off recently, you are fully aware of the power of having friends in other companies. Career mobility in periods of high unemployment is almost entirely driven by your ability to connect with other professionals. But what happens when you don’t have a big network? You’re forced to reach out to people you don’t know personally and ask them for help. It’s like mass marketing. You send out tons of emails and get very few responses. What should you do?
First, it’s not you. But it could be your approach. In this post, we’ll look at a few things you should consider including in your networking strategy.
Authenticity. Your request must feel genuine. Don’t be afraid to share the truth of your situation. Hiding the fact that you got fired or laid off will send signals up like roman candles. If your recipient gets that slightest sense that something isn’t right, they’ll just delete your request.
Action-oriented. You must ensure your request defines how you found the person, why you chose them and how they can help. Make sure they know what you want them to do. The email recipient will assume you’ve taken the time to assess what they do, what their company does and how you will fit in. Therefore, you should have some idea what you them to help you with. If you’re just sending it blindly with the hopes that they’ll figure something out, it won’t happen. Don’t do it.
Reciprocity. Giving back does work. However, your initial approach should offer something to the recipient rather than simply asking for help. As a writer, I'm always asking others for advice. I usually find a way to give something beforehand or in return for their support. It’s a sign that I value their time and effort and appreciate them spending it on me.
Likeness. Search for those who are like you. People who have the same background or upbringing are likely to share the same values as you do. Try to find some commonalities with those you reach out to as it helps establish a connection and give them a reason to consider helping you.
Validation. This is the most powerful tool you can use. If you're looking for help from someone at a higher level than you or in an industry you’ve never worked in before, get a referral. If you’re reaching out to a CEO and another CEO makes a referral for you, you’ve got a good chance that you’ll get a response. Otherwise, the CEO’s gatekeeper will stop your request from ever crossing their desk.
Persistance. Never give up on what you want. People respond to passion. If you’re trying to get a contact in a particular company, don’t quit until you get one. Try different methods for contacting people in the company, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, or direct email. I once sought a contact for 18 months. I did get it. Be persistent.
Help others. Many roads to success have been paved with this strategy. Offer your support to others without regard for reward or payment of your efforts. Good things will come to you. This was Oprah’s claim to fame.
Networking is the key to opportunity in today’s economy. Having all of the other ingredients, such as knowledge, skills, abilities and a college degree, are just part of the admission price to the game. Networking is a skill that can be learned. If you don’t have a big network, you’ll have to practice a lot. But once you find something that works, you can quickly build upon it to find that next great opportunity.
In this post, we’ll hear from speaker and author, Thom Singer, who is an expert in social networking and personal branding. After you read this post on our flaws in Networking, make sure to check out his site to gain a lot more insight on how you can become a much better networker. Thom can be found at www.thomsinger.com. As an MBA student or graduate, you’ll want to read his book, “Some Assembly Required: A Networking Guide for Graduates.”
Now….a few words from Thom Singer.
First of all, we live and serve the ‘John Wayne Cowboy’ society, which is a culture where everyone believes we have to achieve success alone. We think success is for loners but this is hardly true. In reality, it doesn’t matter who you are, from Bill Gates to the president to a person running a successful chain of chicken restaurants, you can’t do everything. Our society is driven by a mentality that we can’t ask for help, because we believe no one is out there to help us. Mentally, we start out totally wrong. There are people who can and will help. Success comes from long-term and mutually beneficial relationships.
Secondly, networking has gotten a bad name over the years. Can you believe it? When people think of networking, they think of ‘takers.’ We think that people only show up when they have a need. For example, “I just got laid off and I better go network because I need a job.” Another common example is with Sales people. When they are not making their quotas, they will call everyone in their network to ask them to make referrals for them. They don’t keep in touch the rest of the time.. On the flip side of this argument is that networking is always happening. It’s a give and take. It’s not something you just do when you need something because people see right through that really quick. So you have to be constantly engaged and be willing to help and serve other people. Don’t keep score. But that’s not the way many people think of networking.
Another problem with networking is the definition. If I ask ten people to give me a definition of networking, I’d probably get 7 or 8 different definitions. The definition I like to use is “the creation of long term and mutually beneficial relationships between two or more where everyone involved succeeds more because of the relationship than they would without the relationship.” The key is that it is mutually beneficial and everyone is successful. People too often overlook this aspect of networking, and fear they might just look needy or like a taker. But if you’re doing it right, you won’t because you’ll be giving far more than you are getting. That never looks bad.
The final reason we struggle with networking is that we often witness many successful people who have law degrees, MBAs and engineering degrees and who are mostly left-brained. They are thoughtful, study hard and do research. They never would be confused as the social butterflies of their world. They are self-identified as introverted. They think it is hard to go out and talk to people, so they do not place a priority on the activity. The surprising reality here is that introverts are better networkers. If we go back to the other examples I mentioned when all you’re doing is talking about yourself, no one is going to like it. No one likes a braggart. Unlike the extroverts, Introverts ask questions and listen intensely to what others are saying. Extroverts can sometimes be focused on what they are going to say next while the other person is talking, missing the entire message. When you are listening to the other person, you are more likely to see where you can make the connection to help them. Most introverts tell me after they get to know someone they are more comfortable in talking about themselves. If an introvert goes in and asks a lot of questions, then they’ll learn something about that person. Knowing a little about someone breeds familiarity and so the introvert becomes more comfortable in sharing things freely.
Networking is your key to career success. Do it incorrectly and you go nowhere. Become proficient at it and you’ll fill your life with opportunity.
Thanks, Thom. We appreciate the time you’ve spent with us. You can find out more about Thom, his books, articles, speaking events and blogs at www.thomsinger.com.
He personally consults, mentors and coaches some of the country’s largest church Pastors, speaks regularly at leadership conferences, churches, corporations, Leadership Roundtables, Minister’s conferences, seminars and other leadership development opportunities. He was named in the top-30 global leadership Gurus list. His singular vision for his life is to Help Others Succeed. Being raised in a pastor’s home in India has uniquely equipped Dr. Chand to share his passion – that of mentoring, developing and inspiring leaders to break all limits – in ministry and the marketplace.
We are truly privileged to bring to you the following interview on Leadership.
Todd: How can MBA graduates become change leaders?
Dr. Chand: The old adage “ the only constant in the world is change” is still true. The challenge with most MBA programs is that they are taught by people like me; that is, boomers, for whom stability and consistency is a mantra. How do we keep the environment stable? How do we make changes or translate changes? The risk threshold for my group is not as great as the risk threshold for students coming up in current MBA programs. To be a change leader is this environment, the professor or mentor has to be a person that transcends their generational stability and consistency issues and be willing to go above and beyond them. Change really is a more constant art. You can’t teach people to change. It is the environment that allows people to change. I mean an environment where change, risk taking, innovation, creativity and new ideas are not frowned upon but are seen as experimentation. That’s what creates the leader attitude. But it has to begin with what happens in the classroom and the environment students find themselves in.
Todd: What skills do students and graduates need to focus on to become a leader?
Dr. Chand: Students and graduates need to build both hard and soft competencies. The hard competencies include project management, strategic planning, implementation, team creation. The soft competencies are far more important than the hard ones. Soft competencies include skills like listening. Listening is one of the top priorities where you are not just hearing biologically but are listening internally, not only to what is being said but what is being omitted. You must go after the omissions because what is not being said is a whole lot more volatile than what is being said. Another soft skill is the idea of having organic conversations. That is holding a conversation that doesn’t begin with the end in mind. You got into the conversation open minded and let the conversation take you where it is going to go. Most people that come out of management or business schools come out with strategic conversations where they have formed some type of mental template. This means that if they take the conversation down a certain road or path, they will get a certain result or outcome. Lastly, a great soft skill is putting aside what you have to bring to the conversation aside and not letting your contribution be the centerpiece of the interaction. It is not about getting this account, getting the job or what you’ll get out of it. It’s about helping others succeed. It’s about going into a situation where you are thinking about what can make this other person successful. It’s about a win, not a win-win. A win-win is a 50% proposition. A win is a 100% proposition. Every promotion or raise you’ll get will come because you have created significant value for someone else, so much so that they want to continue to take you along on their journey. If you make them successful, you will be successful.
Being a change leader today requires the development of some unique soft competencies. They are unique in the fact that these aren’t the type of skills business schools teach. Taking from one of today’s leadership gurus, who has tested these skills in many different environment with many different audiences, the soft side is your ticket to greater success, even if you aren’t focusing on making yourself successful. Good luck on your journey.
Thanks, Dr. Chand for sharing your time and experience with us. You can learn much more about Dr. Chand at www.samchand.com. You can capture more of his wisdom from his many books and CD sets located on his Resources page.
Our first ebook "The Joy of an MBA" has been released!
The first book in the Henry Series for MBAs has been released!

This book is for all who've thought about getting an MBA and what it could do for your career. It's also for those who have the MBA but haven't felt the impact of it yet. While the MBA is touted as the credentional to have to build real career success, few have learned how to use this key to unlock the door to success.
The Joy of an MBA will take you deep into the minds of MBA graduates and students from around the globe. You'll learn why they got their degree and what they are doing with it. It's a look into the career paths of others who share the same dreams as you.
This book is not a bunch of statistics about the MBA that, while interesting, are not useful in helping you plan your path to success. Experience is learning by trying. That's what you'll get from this book. You'll feel the years of experience and you will take the lessons to fold into your strategy for making your dreams come true.
You can find "The Joy of an MBA" at Amazon and Barnes & Noble websites. If you're considering the MBA or are a student, this book will serve as a guide through your program and into the business world. If you’re an MBA graduate, you'll enjoy the stories told by other MBA graduates from around the globe on how they use their MBA to improve many aspects of their career.
http://www.amazon.com/Joy-MBA-Henry-ebook/dp/B005OD6TB2/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1316608323&sr=8-4
Stay tuned, Book #2, The MBA’S VALUE PROPOSITION, will be released at the end of this month. In this book, students and graduates will learn how to communicate their value as an MBA holder to potential employers, bosses, admissions and many more audiences.
Dakota Meyer was recently awarded the Medal of Honor by the Commander in Chief for disobeying his leaders' orders. This is an interesting contradiction. The highest level military leader awards the highest honor to a soldier for disobeying an order. We all understand why he did it and certainly commend his bravery. But why was this necessary? Several officers had the opportunity to make the right decision and save lives. But they didn't. Meyer saved 36 lives. His leadership failed to assess the situation accurately. Officers are trained to be leaders, right? At the very least, they are in a position that must make decisions for others.
I know you are thinking what I am. Just because you are college educated and put in a leadership position, are you really a leader? Officers are trained. Intentional efforts are made to develop specific skills in the area of leadership. This type of activity falls in line with the belief that leadership can be taught. Let’s dig a little deeper.
Are leaders born or made? This question has been asked a million times. We’ve just looked at one simple example of making leaders and have found that there are some serious issues with that approach. Let’s take a look at a few situations to see if we can better understand the question.
Let’s now consider the corporate environment. How many times have you been in a corporate M&A where the bigger company buys a smaller one and brings their leaders in to take over your company? After a few weeks, you realize the new leadership doesn't know anything about your business; much less, the competition, the market, the technology and so on. A year or two later, your company has been downsized and is making less revenue than before the acquisition. The smaller company is either sold, shut down or left holding on to the end of their rope with both hands and a death grip. Often the leadership will restructure the management ranks in an attempt to spark some life back into the company. In Ken Blanchard’s book, “Leading at a Higher Level,” he mentions that some of the best leaders in industry set their sights on the right targets and vision. Can you teach someone to be a visionary?
What about politics? Yes, I know, I usually don’t talk about this stuff but it’s too easy to use them as an example. Leaders in the white house and congress are supposed to bring people together to resolve issues. Yet, every time you see them on the news (because we never see them in public), they just seem to be blaming someone else for their lack of progress. John Maxwell mentions in his book, “The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership, “ that leadership ability determines a person’s level of effectiveness.” If congress can’t get results on anything (i.e. not effective), what does it say about their ability? Arthur Carmazzi, author of “The 6 Dimensions of Top Achievers,” suggests that leader requires an understanding of how YOU as a leader affect the Psychology of a group, and how the group’s reactions affect you and each of the individual members of that group. Carmazzi also suggests that a leader’s actions and reactions not only affect the psychology of individuals, but affect the entire culture of the organization or group. So do you think blaming others has an impact? Does it help or hurt? Have we filled our government with real leaders?
Ok, enough examples. In looking at whether leaders are born or made, we might want to consider some characteristics of leaders. Daniel Goleman, in his Harvard Business Review article “What makes a good leader?” states that “Without [emotional intelligence], a person can have first-class training, an incisive mind, and an endless supply of good ideas, but he still won't make a great leader.” Emotional intelligence can be learned but the problem is we aren’t good at identifying it in the workplace and based on our history of developing leadership, we probably couldn’t teach this in the workplace anyhow. Remember, we hire the right people in the first place (i.e. someone we don’t have to train).
Stephen Covey identifies effective communication as a key characteristic. Communication skills can be taught but does it make one an effective communicator? John Maxwell talks about the Law of Intuition. Can we teach intuition? Look around the web and you’ll find thousands of characteristics for leaders, such as empathy, respect, vision, passion, purpose, and so on. Can we teach all of these?
Are leaders born or made? I think the answer is convoluted by our interpretation of the word ‘leader.’ When we think of this word, we usually envision a great leader, not an average one. It’s true that we can teach many people specific skills and put them in a leadership position. If that’s the definition of a leader, then we can make them but I wouldn’t expect spectacular results. If we expect a leader to deliver extraordinary results, then we better find people who are gifted in many of those leader characteristics. This difference would lead us to the comparison between talent and skill. Such as, you can teach a guy to play basketball but you can’t make them the next Michael Jordan. Regardless of our definition of the word ‘leader’ or whether they are born or made, the world needs more of them.
What do you think?
I’ve always wondered why employees really need to be concerned with personal branding. It’s certainly a hot topic on the web. I’ve watched people write blogs that eventually became books and magazines. Heck, some even grew into businesses. So why does a regular employee in a company concern themselves with branding? You would think that their performance against their goals should be sufficient to determine their value to the company, unless business has gotten more complicated. I can’t see that as being the case. However, I do think change has come. Actually, it has diffused from the top echelon to the lowest levels of the organization. Here’s my pitch.
Henry Mintzberg performed an amazing study in the early 1970’s for his PhD dissertation at MIT analyzing the actual work habits and time management of chief executive officers (CEOs). He found that CEOs performed ten managerial roles. I don’t want to go into much detail here on each role. You can read his book by HarperCollins, entitled “The Nature of Managerial Work” if you want to know more. The point is that of these roles, the CEOs spent most of their time looking outward. This means they don’t spend a lot of time analyzing the internal workings of the company or developing the next level of leaders. They are the face of the company and consider themselves challenged to grow the company by interacting with potential customers, partners, etc.
Since they are CEOs and just one individual in the company, their absence from the day-to-day work is tolerable. Now, let’s look just below the CEOs. In the 1980's, top managers and practitioners began to question middle managers' importance. At the same time, environmental changes such as the globalization of the economy and the development of information technology fostered variations in organizational structures. These changes, often associated with downsizing, probably resulted in a modification of middle managers' roles. You think?
Pavett and Lau performed a study in the 80’s looking at the other level of managers and compared them with Mintzberg’s results on CEOs. They found that the lower level managers emulated the higher levels of managers. Why? One startling conclusion was that managers that performed the duties we would normally think a manager should perform, such as training and development of employees, were promoted far less than managers that emulated the top brass. This is a breakdown in design. If managers can get promoted by avoiding the activities that were originally designed into their job, then they will undoubtedly abstain from doing that work. You get what you reward, right?
So here’s my thinking on branding today. The same trend that went from the CEOs down to the lowest levels of management has diffused further into the ranks of the salaried and even hourly workers. Performance isn’t something we are graded on anymore. Just look at your last performance review. It’s all social or soft skills that we need to be good at. But why? That seems more like a skill for those outward facing, like a CEO, than it does for the lower ranks of the company. Employees should be focused on their tasks and ensuring they perform effectively and efficiently. However, if they aren’t graded on that performance, then you won’t get it. Lower managers are focused on acting like a CEO. It’s on their minds. It’s how they grade themselves. Have they passed this down to their own employees? Could we now be faced with a system that’s totally based on social awareness? Are we now in a society were social prowess trumps technical prowess at all levels?
Share your thoughts.
In this post, I share some advice from my recent discussion with Brian Tracy. Brian Tracy is Chairman and CEO of Brian Tracy International, a company specializing in the training and development of individuals and organizations. Brian Tracy has consulted for more than 1,000 companies and addressed more than 4,000,000 people in 4,000 talks and seminars throughout the US, Canada and 40 other countries worldwide. As a Keynote speaker and seminar leader, he addresses more than 250,000 people each year. Brian Tracy has studied, researched, written and spoken for 30 years in the fields of economics, history, business, philosophy and psychology. He is the top selling author of over 45 books that have been translated into dozens of languages.
Here’s a few notes from this interview.
Todd: What are the most difficult aspects of the career to set goals for? How do can MBAs get around them?
Brian: You start off with your income. Make a five or your ten year plan. Then you say “what will I have to contribute for them to willingly pay me this amount?” What MBAs have to understand is that the MBA degree is a like a merit badge in the Boy Scouts. It indicates to the employer that you have certain abilities to achieve goals. It doesn’t indicate that you can, just that you have the ability. Most companies take two years to detrain an MBA to get them to the point where they can contribute something worthwhile. The job of the MBA is to short circuit that learning curve. The key focus to MBAs has to be results, not just the goals you get from your employer. The most important results are financial results. You have to increase sales or revenue, or either reduce cost, depending on your area of specialization. A great opportunity in business today is to put great focus on increasing revenues through marketing and sales. You have to find some way to have an influence on revenues. That has to be the central focus of the MBA. Now remember that 80% of people that graduate from college never use what they learned for the rest of their lives. Therefore, all the courses you take are what I call mental pushups. They indicate you can do mental pushups. Now you have to get results to to help your company get more results today. That has to be the focus. With the law of indirect effort, the giver results in higher pay, job security, faster promotion and greater attractiveness in the market. The indirect way of impressing another person (Law of Indirect Effort); however, is simply to be impressed by the other person. The more you are impressed by the other person, by who he or she is, or what he or she has accomplished, the more likely it is that the other person will be impressed by you.
Todd: How should MBAs set priorities for achieving their goals (e.g. effort, time, reward)?
Brian: The most important qualities for success with the MBA are focus and concentration. You must have absolute clarity about what you are trying to accomplish. Then, concentrate on just these activities. So, I’ve deemed what I call the Law of Three. There are basically three tasks that we engage in that contribute 90% of the results or value in that job. Everything else is in the other 10%. So what you have to do is to make a list of everything you do in the course of a week or a month. Then ask yourself if “I can only do one thing on this list which activity contributes the greatest value to my business?” Put a circle around that. Then, ask the question again, if I can only do two things? Then, try three things. The answers should pop out at you. If you don’t know the answers, you haven’t got a chance. One of the ideas I share when teaching teambuilding is that you are not only competing with every other company, you are personally competing with your counterpart in every other company. There’s an old saying that goes “if you’re not constantly learning to get better, somewhere some else is.” If you are doing this, when you meet that person you will lose. Therefore, you are competing with your counterpart who is doing the same job trying to get the same result in a competitive company. Just like in the Olympics, you’re competing against athletes from other nations. Your competing against business athletes from other companies. The other thing is you’re also competing with the people within your business, who also want the same rewards, promotions, perks and opportunities that you do. Don’t forget that while teamwork is working together, loving, hugging and sharing, every person you are working with wants to get more and better rewards, So you are going to have to outperform the people to the right and left of you. The only way you can do that is first by focusing on the really valuable things that make a big difference to your boss and company and continually getting better at what you do.
So I say with regards to the Law of Three, do fewer things but do more of them, do them more of the time and get better at it. Getting better is one of the most important skills for an MBA; that is to continually get better at the most important things. If you don’t know what they are, just go ask your boss. Just say “Hey, I just got my MBA. If there were a few major things that contribute 90% of the value to the company, what would you say I could do to make the biggest contribution I can?”
Our thanks to Mr. Tracy for taking time to speak with us. More tips and advice from Brian Tracy will appear in our upcoming ebooks for MBAs.
Go to www.briantracy.com to learn more. You can also capture some great advice from his blog at www.briantracy.com/blog.
John Adair is the Chair of Strategic Leadership for the United Nations and one of Britain's foremost authorities on leadership and leadership development in organizations. In this post, you'll learn about one of his most important contributions to the understanding of leadership.
Before Adair, and arguably still today, people associate leadership with the so called 'Great Man Theory.' In other words, we see leadership as one charismatic individual who uses his or her personal power and rhetoric to mobilize the company. Even Adair admits that this mentality needs to change.
Adair approaches leadership from a more practical and simple angle; by describing what leaders have to do and the actions they need to take. This is a warm welcome to many MBA graduates who seek to be a high achiever and are looking for a path to greater career success. Knowing what to do and how to act is one of their largest hurdles.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), about 156,250 MBA degrees are granted each year in the US. MBA students represent about 25% of all Master’s graduates. That’s a lot of potential leaders heading into the corporate world every year. But many graduates have little leadership experience and are cast into organizations that hold the perception that MBAs are created to lead.
Where should MBAs graduates begin? “It is absolutely essential that MBAs take on board the relatively recently discovered generic role of a business (using that term in the widest sense) leader. For that centres on the three circles of task, team and individual. So it forms the basis of effective leadership at all three levels: team, operational and strategic,” says Adair.
These circles are part of Adair’s Action-Centered Leadership Model. Each circle overlaps and influences the other. A good leader recognizes that a healthy interaction between the team, the task and the individual is vital. So for example, if you’re leading a project, then you, as the leader, would need to think about:
Task: what are the goals, what are the resources needed, what are the timelines, etc.
Team: how will the tasks be divided amongst the team, how often will they meet, how will they interact with stakeholders, how will they measure success etc.
Individual: are the team members working to their strengths? Are they learning from each experience? Are they being listened to on the team? etc.
Basically if one person is to run a group of others, then the size of the group will be determined in the first place by the task requirements of the job. This is the first area of need that a leader must to look at, i.e. task needs. They also have to try to use the expertise and talents of their subordinates and more importantly, coordinate one person with another and create an effective working group or team. Success is achieved by balancing all three circles.

We can see through our own experience in everyday life, how these three areas interact with each other and how sometimes one area can be ignored, resulting in disruption in the other two. In organizations, such disruptions invoke a leader mindset failure that if ignored for a length of time can easily derail your personal success.
As an MBA graduate, you’re expected to be a good leader. If you remain focused on Adair’s three circles, you can prove your worth at almost any level of the organization.
If the three circles aren’t providing you enough clarity for proper execution, you may want to take a step back and engage in introspection. Adair has provided many great resources to aid in creating more success. Among these are his ‘100 Greatest Ideas’ series which includes ‘100 Greatest Ideas for Being a Brilliant Manager’ and ‘100 Greatest Ideas for Effective Leadership’.
We would like to thank Dr. John Adair for taking the time to share his expertise with us. You can learn more about his work at http://www.adair-international.com and http://www.johnadair.co.uk.
Please stay tuned for more of his expertise in our upcoming ebook series for MBA potentials, students and graduates.
Action Centred Leadership and the Three Circles (words and image) are trademarks™ used by John Adair and Adair International Ltd. ACL is a registered trademark® of John Adair.